Within the birding community the value of any month is often judged by the number of species likely to be seen and the ‘rarity’ of at least some of those; hence, June is often considered a ‘quiet’ time. I much prefer to enjoy every moment that nature sends, whether it be commonplace or otherwise. The present June scored on every level, as I shall now divulge.
Throughout the month Loch Connell served as a residency for a lone Pink-footed Goose – presumably a bird ‘pricked’ by shot from a hunter’s gun and unable to make the return journey home to Iceland with its brethren. At the same site eight pairs of feral Greylag Geese raised 43 juveniles between them. On the 20th a female Shelduck was observed there with five moderately sized ducklings. No other ducklings of this species were encountered at the Wig this year – yet another sad first and undoubtedly attributable to the increased number of people using the area as a consequence of Covid regulations and its encouragement of daily exercise.
Mute Swan numbers on Loch Ryan steadily built up, with 22 adults present at Leffnoll on the 28th. On the freshwater of Loch Connell several broods of Mallards were seen throughout the month, with ducklings ranging from very recently hatched right the way through to fully fledged juveniles. Here, also, was a drake Wigeon (in eclipse plumage) on the 6th and a pair of Teal (the male also in eclipse) on the 27th. Presumably the same two drake Velvet Scoters, that were present last month on Loch Ryan, remained up to at least the 28th; on many occasions they were seen very close inshore at the Wig, where they were frequently found in the company of a moulting flock of male Red-breasted Mergansers. The latter species peaked at 58 birds on the 21st, when there were also four female Common Scoters in the same vicinity. Let us not forget the common Eiders. Sure, they are well enough known birds to regular visitors in the area, but June is typically witness to a dramatic transformation in the males’ appearance. It starts slowly with just a few birds showing more signs of black in their plumage than usual; then as the month progresses the change gathers momentum until the number of blackish-looking birds outnumbers those with white on their feathers. Come the months end there are even a handful of birds that appear from a distance almost totally black and, thus, easily confused with any Velvet Scoters. Such is the succession to eclipse plumage of drake Eiders, with no two birds ever looking quite the same under close scrutiny. As for female Eiders there are very few on the loch at this time: perhaps a handful or so, and usually with ducklings in attendance. The youngsters are bite-sized ‘ready meals’ for resident Great Black-backed and Herring Gulls. Needless to say that few Eider ducklings on Loch Ryan ever reach adulthood.
Some of the many eclipsed Eider variations |
A singleton Great Crested Grebe, in breeding plumage, was the only representative for divers and grebes present on the sea loch this month; sightings of it were, however, sporadic.
A Fulmar seen flying past the Scar on the 3rd was the only record for this species, too. Similarly, there was just one observation of Manx Shearwaters, involving three birds which also flew past the Scar, but on the 19th. More exceptional was a Storm Petrel heard calling under the cover of darkness on the evening of the 7th.
After last month’s relatively big numbers of Gannets there were fewer noted in June; a high of 51 about Loch Ryan on the 11th did include a brownish second year and a slightly whiter immature. Up until this date all of the previous Gannets seen here this year have been adults.
Water Rails can be noisy birds, especially when they occur at high densities; but locally there are very few of them and are thus unrecorded more often than not. To bag one, so to speak, on the 17th was therefore very welcome indeed.
In this neck of the woods it is not surprising for there to be few waders about in June: just eight Ringed Plovers at the Scar on the 10th, some 30 Curlews on the 22nd and 83 Oystercatchers there on the 26th. Common Sandpipers, which are annual but rare breeders on the local patch, were notably absent (the effects of Covid regulations once again making its impact felt?). Several Whimbrel at Piltanton, during a Webs Count on the 14th, and four Lapwings at Loch Connell on the 20th were at least some compensation for the lack of numbers and variety of waders elsewhere.
Common Gulls were observed more frequently than expected. The first returning bird was seen on the 9th, thereafter birds trickled through with 11 on the 26th, increasing to 20 on the 30th. A pleasant surprise was an adult Glaucous Gull visiting the Scar on the evening of the 20th but, alas, it was not seen again. Sandwich Terns were regular in small numbers throughout the month, building up to 30 birds on the 26th. In contrast, sightings of Arctic Terns were restricted to just two birds on the 18th; likewise, only two Common Terns on the following day, the 19th. Sadly the great expectations for Roseate Terns from last month, was curtailed in early June. It is possible only to presume that any nesting attempt failed; a single adult was noted on the 6th and none thereafter. On a brighter note a dark phase Arctic Skua about the Wig on the 14th was an unseasonable gift.
Field Sketch of a Glaucous Gull - they really are quite large! |
With the exception of the resident Black Guillemots – which are not always easy to detect away from their breeding stations - other auk species are rare at this time of year, despite their abundance on the cliffs of nearby Ailsa Craig. Five Razorbills on the 1st was the only record.
Swifts are scarce visitors to Kirkcolm, with only three or four records per annum. Two on the 20th, preceding a rain shower, was thus a meritorious occasion. The day before, however, was both unprecedented and monumental, with a different kind of swift hawking at high speed over the garden at lunchtime. It was a Plain Swift, a species ordinarily found in Madeira and the Canary Islands. If accepted by the British Birds Rarity Committee it will constitute a first record for Britain, so I am informed. But I do not hold out much hope on this front because I was the sole observer and failed dismally in obtaining any photographic evidence to support the claim….a nice bird, anyway! Rather more common – and less daunting to identify because of this! – are Barn Swallows and House Martins. There are few breeding pairs of both about the main cluster of properties that form the heart of the village of Kirkcolm. A flock of 24 House Martins on the 26th was possibly an indication of early autumn passage rather than an assembly of locals gathering to feast.
Great Spotted Woodpeckers are rarely commented upon in the Blog, so I will share with you what I consider to be an interesting observation. Juveniles of the species frequently draw attention to themselves with their harsh cries for food; consequently they have been conspicuous of late about the Corsewall estate. One parent bird, in particular, whilst busy supplying it’s young with food, has taken to foraging out in the open and hopping over lawned areas in a manner I more typically associate with Green Woodpeckers. I have often seen it digging holes in the ground with its bill to extract some juicy morsel, repeatedly working a patch over before moving on a few yards to try its luck.
Despite June being a fairly quiet time for bird song I have met with snatches of flutey – and not so flutey – notes from Blackcaps, Chiffchaffs, Whitethroats and Willow Warblers on my walks. A series of unexpected ‘ticking’ calls led me to the discovery of two pairs of Grasshopper Warblers, separated only by a matter of yards. One pair attended two juveniles and the other had a nest containing three young. This was an exceptional and happy accident to befall me and one which I know will be warmly retained in my memory for a long time to come.
The exciting find of a stunning, adult, Rose-coloured Starling on the 6th was only briefly to be appreciated. Within seconds of seeing it in my garden it promptly flew away. Perhaps it was the same bird that later that day turned up in a Stranraer garden.
Rose-coloured Starlings are easily etched into the memory |
Siskins continued to be present throughout the month, with a number of breeding pairs and juveniles noted. Far more numerous were Linnets, with a post-breeding flock of some 100 birds seen about the ‘Twite fields’ on the 25th. In contrast, Reed Buntings in the vicinity of the Wig remained secretive, or at least went mostly undetected.
July should see an increase in the numbers of waders on passage, but whether this will be so remains to be seen. Such promise of the unknown also promotes fancy in the minds of humankind, and I for one look forward to it with keen expectation and anticipation.
This article and the information within were provided by courtesy of S. Grover
I would have had Swifts as decidedly scarce in that part of the world. Are you serious about Plain Swift? You clearly know where they do occur but did you know this would constitute a ‘first’ for Britain and Ireland? I presume your update has been misconstrued as it would never pass muster as a single observer record with no photographic backup. It takes far longer to get a submission past and agreed by the committee than you give the impression. The bird you saw was either a Common Swift in hard lighting or more likely a fresh juvenile. A lot of people have seen your post as i did. When i first read it my eyes rolled, but as you have ticked it as accepted i cannot let your ‘find’ stand without comment.
ReplyDeleteBack to the drawing board mate - 1st rule when thinking you have found a rarity is try hard, very hard in this case, that is nothing more than the common species that it will invariably be๐๐ป
Thank you very much for your comment and for pointing this out to us, you are quite right to be skeptical. We have been in contact with the BBRC and it seems that some error resulted in them sending an automated "accepted" email. I have since updated the blog as a result of this misunderstanding. We are now waiting for an official response for the record, but in the mean time thanks for stopping to checking out our blog!
DeleteI would like to take this opportunity to post an enormous thank you to Benjamin and Eleanor for the hard work they put into keeping this blog running as a valuable source of information for keen birders near and far. I know how long it takes them to digitize all their father's field notes and present them in an ordered and eye-catching format.
ReplyDeleteAs a blog, it would not be possible to dedicate space to the detailed description of every unusual species seen, so it is understandable that there is skepticism in the wider birdwatching community when such a rare possible record is mentioned. With over fifty years of birdwatching experience, my husband would not have shared such an extraordinary sighting if he was not confident of his conclusions from close observation of the bird. As the blog states, we are still doubtful of the record's acceptance, and it was very unfortunate the the clerical error from BBRC was not caught in time to prevent such confusion arising.
It is so important to encourage birdwatchers, of all ages, to share their sightings, not put people down with negativity.
So, for the disgruntled gentleman in Sour-bridge, I would like to point out that we do have swifts in Scotland! Though, like elsewhere, they are sadly declining. They do arrive slightly later than in the south, and subsequently juveniles are rarely on the wing before mid-July, making a juvenile sighting in mid-June just as unlikely as a Plain Swift!
So much of Scotland remains under-recorded for wildlife, and with its balmy micro-climate from the Gulf Stream and several hot spots for tired migrants to pause at, Dumfries and Galloway is a great place to be a nature enthusiast. Visit us and see!
Read my post again.....
ReplyDeleteI am neither disgruntled nor negative about sightings per se.
If people are reporting, almost casually, ‘first’ records for Britain and Ireland without putting the news out locally and certainly not bothering to notify the relevant County Recorder then it questions both their observational integrity and grasp of peer protocol.
Personal reputation when finding scarce or rare birds takes a while, perhaps a decade, to build up. This is done by a process based on correct observations and identification criteria. Peer acceptance is all important. Personal experience, often abroad and particularly in this case, is crucial and either field notes made at the time and / or sketches or increasingly digital images will ensure critical acceptance. I, like many other field birders, wear binoculars as an almost permanent appendage and seldom venture outside without a digital bridge camera. I do not find a great deal here in Sour-bridge, West Midlands but seldom are unable to record any relevant records.
All the above aside the claim of a Plain Swift in the context of its status without peer feedback is a slap in the face for countless hours put in by birders faithfully birding their local patch and consequently cannot go unchallenged. The BBRC response was the acceptance of a submitted record by an automated algorithm. The lack of knowledge by the submitter is evident.
Here’s how it works:
Rare bird > Finder > County Recorder > BBRC > BOURC for acceptance onto the British list in an allotted category. The whole system is designed to filter out the crap. The record doesn’t get past the County Recorder as they are the ‘gatekeeper’. The BBRC have a floating membership of a dozen or so co-opted experts in various fields. The BOURC ratify. Hopefully this should help when claiming future firsts๐๐๐ป
I would like to clarify some things before addressing this comment.
DeleteFirst, all the records on this blog are not recorded or submitted by me. They are done so by my father, Stephen Grover, a birder of 50+ years who practically sleeps in his binoculars and is a well known and respected ornithologist. Secondly, this blog was not intended to act as a record of all of our sightings. It is to promote interest in wildlife across our local area by providing a snapshot of our monthly experiences.
Unfortunately it appears you have made some assumptions whilst not knowing the facts, and so landed at your own conclusion.
This record was submitted by following all the proper protocols. When submitting to the BBRC we also separately contacted our county recorder with whom we are acquainted.
Several weeks after this we received an email from the BBRC stating the "record has been accepted by the rarities committee". This was not the automated response email for submitting a record, and the BBRC secretary later clarified this and has apologised for the error on their part.
The record is currently under review, however it was still an exciting sight and one which we wanted to share with our local readers.
I hope this has cleared matters up for you, and if you wish for further correspondence please contact me by email.